Avalon Treatment Centers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371840060
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Phone
8509992623
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,946
Expenses
$197,352
Assets
$4,335

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joanna Johnson (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Nicole Tang (Office Manager)
  • Joanna Johnson (CEO)
  • Sean Priser (Intake Coordinator)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Avalon Treatment Centers is to improve the quality of life for all Big Bend and Florida residents by providing unique and effective treatment. Our programs aim to free substance abusers and victims of addiction from the bondage of the disease of addiction and consequently, relieving other citizens from substance abuse/addiction-related crimes as well dealing with issues such as domestic violence, anger management, mental health, and theft.

What it reported doing in 2019

The Batterer Intervention Program is a court ordered mandatory condition of probation for defendants who plea to domestic violence charges. Avalon Treatment Centers provides this certified service with standardized programming to further the safety of victims and their children and to hold the perpetrators of domestic violence accountable for their acts. This program services up to 15 clients on a weekly basis for a 26 week timeframe.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 93.4%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 63.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 69.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 85.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 93.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $184K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.