Auxiliary Volunteer Services of Mcalester Regional Health Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455370974
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Mcalester, OK, USA
Phone
9184218023
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,463
Expenses
$9,755
Assets
$139,243
Liabilities
$2,696

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHIRLEY BISHOP (PRESIDENT)
  • RONNA BALDWIN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHIRLEY BISHOP (PRESIDENT)
  • RONNA BALDWIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA YOUNG (SECRETARY (BEGINNING APRIL 2025))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide mcalester regional health center authority (mrhc), a related governmental hospital, with high quality volunteer services for mrhc to provide the greatest possible patient care and provide for the greatest possible physical well-being of the ill, injured, or otherwise disabled patient regardless of sex, race, creed, national origin, or ability to pay.

What it reported doing in 2024

Grants and contributions to support mcalester regional health center authority (mrhc), a related governmental hospital, volunteer services, and raise additional funds in support of mrhc programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.27; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.