Auxiliary of the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
226014339
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Oceanport, NJ, USA
Phone
9733224032
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,315
Expenses
$182,097
Assets
$156,653
Liabilities
$11,890

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZA STASI (PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
  • BRITTANY PAIGE NOSHER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
  • CAROL LAVITT (2ND VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
  • BENJAMIN HAWS (3RD VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZA STASI (PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
  • BRITTANY PAIGE NOSHER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)
  • CAROL LAVITT (2ND VICE PRESIDENT - TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and promote the programs and resources of robert wood johnson university hospital ("rwjuh") through fundraising, community outreach, education and service. Rwjuh is a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization which provides medically necessary healthcare services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory manner regardless of race, color, creed, sex, national origin or ability to pay.

What it reported doing in 2024

Scholarships are awarded to high school seniors who are children of robert wood johnson university hospital; a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, full-time employees. Scholarships are awarded based on a review of the overall quality of the application, academic achievement, school, community and work activities, volunteer activities, letters of recommendation, personal essays and personal interviews with the candidates selected. Since the organization is an affiliate within a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system, a strong emphasis is placed on the applicant's history of community involvement and community services, including volunteerism, peer support, and other methods of giving of him or herself to the community. Evaluation of academic strength and personal achievements are also important factors in the selection process.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,267.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $182K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants and related organizations
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.