Auxiliary of John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237103817
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
3128640384
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$148,132
Expenses
$138,666
Assets
$408,557
Liabilities
$98,080

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEMETRA SOTER (PRESIDENT)
  • JEWELL THOMPSON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RONI SAPAULA (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DEMETRA SOTER (PRESIDENT)
  • JEWELL THOMPSON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RONI SAPAULA (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide auxiliary services to john h. Stroger jr. Hospital of cook county

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide funding for various patient services to/for pediatrics, art therapy, oncology, burn unit, patient education, short-term stay residences, and purchase of furniture at john h. Stroger jr. Hospital of cook county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 44% for direct work, and 56% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 87.4%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.95; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.7% of revenue deployed · 87.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $121K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.