Autismazing Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811673536
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- New Bern, NC, USA
- Phone
- 2526316786
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Autism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,276
- Expenses
- $11,947
- Assets
- $2,214
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Deborah Kania (President)
People named in this filing
- Raquel Bates (Board member)
- Jude Casseday (Secretary)
- Brittni Haskett (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to improve higher education, employment and entrepreneurial opportunities for young adults 13-30 years of age on the autism spectrum through financial support, programs and other initiatives. Increase public awareness of the talents and strengths possessed by autistic youth and adults. To advocate on behalf of autistic persons who may not have ability to do so. To provide support to autistic persons in their pursuit of higher education, careers or entrepreneurship (in the form of grants) To educate and support autistic adults in pursuing lifelong independence.
What it reported doing in 2024
Information shared on Web, social media and through other media to increase understanding and acceptance of autistic persons; increase awareness of entities and programs to assist autistic young persons in their transition to being a successful independent adult. Our social media following continues to grow.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.1%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 18
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -90.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.1% of revenue deployed · 17.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.