Authentic Leadership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383218116
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Holland, MI, USA
- Phone
- 6164052496
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $181,346
- Expenses
- $104,056
- Assets
- $97,410
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL WEBSTER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DANIEL WEBSTER (PRESIDENT)
- JUDY WEBSTER (TREASURER/SE)
- BRIAN LUBINSKI (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Authentic leadership inc. Exists to assist the network of student ministries across america in reaching their goal of seeing every student on every campus have an opportunity to hear the gospel of jesus christ and then be discipled by an authentic and effective leader. Authentic leadership inc. Will assist them and the churches in which they serve, by offering mentoring, training, and consulting of youth leaders, pastors, and lay leaders in the areas of authentic leadership, life process, and strategy.
What it reported doing in 2025
Authentic leadership inc. Supplies speakers, mentors and training for youth and youth programs, church staff and leadership activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.2%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.6%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 61.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.