Austin Texas Rollergirls Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261916572
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5126796233
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports Competitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,467
- Expenses
- $54,899
- Assets
- $194,158
- Liabilities
- $5,936
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- CHELSEA DAVIS (CHIEF PRODUCTION OFFICER)
- ERIN MICHELLE ALLEN (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER)
- ISHA MOUSSEAU (CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of austin Texas rollergirls dba Texas rollergirls (txrg), is to play and promote the sport of women's flat track derby. We provide superior athleticism every time we play and are committed to introducing new fans to our revolutionary sport.
What it reported doing in 2025
Txrg operates and provides superior athletic opportunities for women and girls in the austin area to learn, train and compete in support of the sport, women's flat track derby. Txrg also promotes and introduces new fans to women's flat track roller derby by hosting public competitions in austin, Texas, and by traveling and participating in competitions statewide, nationally and internationally. Txrg promoted women's flat track roller derby by working to create and improve relationships with the city of austin and other community organizations, including keep austin beautiful, while maintaining an active role in the national governing body, women's flat track derby association (wftda).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 41.3%; rating input score 41
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -99.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.54; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 67.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.4% of revenue deployed · 41.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.