Austin Partners in Education
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201024501
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2546643295
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,519
- Expenses
- $484,185
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
People named in this filing
- RICK WHITELEY (BOARD CHAIR)
- MATIAS SEGURA (BOARD MEMBER)
- DOYLE VALDEZ (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.
What it reported doing in 2025
Since 2004, austin partners in education (apie) has partnered with austin independent school district (isd) to deliver best-practice, scalable, and results-driven learning models for math, mentoring, and college readiness to students in austin isds under-resourced communities. In line with our mission, apie utilizes members of the local community to help close the opportunity gap created by income inequality and address the need for a trained and educated workforce. Apie programs are designed to support the academic needs of austins most at-risk students and can readily adapt to the districts evolving instructional delivery models. Each year, apie recruits, organizes, and trains over 100 of volunteers to work with austin isd students through the programs outlined below: -college readiness: delivers campus interventions to austin isd high school students to increase the number of students who meet Texas college readiness standards as measured by the Texas success initiative (tsi). Interventions include building student awareness on the relevance of the college experience and providing academic support in math, english language arts, and writing. Targeted high school students work with an apie staff member in regular, ongoing tutoring sessions focused on closing academic gaps and preparing them to succeed on the tsi assessment. -math classroom coaching: provides academic support for middle school students in math by training and deploying hundreds of community volunteers - often employed in stem-related fields - who conduct weekly 45-minute small group sessions with 3-4 students. Coaches support the acquisition of mathematical subject knowledge, particularly aimed towards preparing students for high school level math. Coaches also share their career paths and provide feedback to students and encourage positive attitudes towards mathematics. -mentoring program: volunteers meet one-on-one with students on district campuses in weekly mentoring sessions. Mentors serve as positive role models for students, helping them build self- confidence and set goals for the future. Mentoring is individualized to meet the needs of each student and can include activities such as reading, discussing careers, preparing college applications, academic tutoring, and developing effective study habits. Apie continues to support campus partnership programs, which are strategic alliances between the schools, business and community members to help meet the needs of aisd schools. Together, apies innovative programs occur at critical steps in a students path to graduating high school, increasing rates of college matriculation and opening pathways towards rewarding, financially stable careers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -350.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $421K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.