Austin Intellectual Property Law Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742422311
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5128538800
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,853
Expenses
$98,279
Assets
$78,819

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alex Bistline (President)
  • Jesse Adland (Vice President)
  • Valerie Barker (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Alex Bistline (President)
  • Jesse Adland (Vice President)
  • Alex Knapp (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Austin Intellectual Property Law Association was organized to promote the understanding of intellectual property and related areas of law; to promote and assist in the growth and promotion of programs designed for discussion, exchange of ideas, and possible solutions to various common problems relating to intellectual property law; to promote friendly relations between its members; to provide information regarding current trends, prepare reports, and offer seminars to members relating to intellectual property law; and to maintain a high standard of professional ethics in the profession.

What it reported doing in 2024

Monthly meetings with featured speakers on intellectual property topics (and continuing legal education credit).

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.