Austin County Go Texan Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262029563
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Bellville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9793575709
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,278
- Expenses
- $40,847
- Assets
- $188,119
- Liabilities
- $8,344
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOE LONGORIA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARSHA SIPTAK (TREASURER)
- JOE LONGORIA (PRESIDENT)
- LORI HIGGINS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation shall encourage and promote agricultural science, research and educational functions primarily by awarding scholarships to deserving students in austin county in accordance with the criteria set forth in the by-laws of the corporation. The organization may make distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organization under the internal revenue code of 1986, irc section 501(c)(3)(1992), and shall promote the houston livestock show and rodeo.
What it reported doing in 2024
Scholarships awarded to deserving students in austin county in promoting agricultural science, research and educational functions. Grants awarded to organizations that shall promote the houston livestock show and rodeo and agricultural science, research and educational functions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 84% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.3%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.61; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.