Austin Chapter of Naiop
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844896130
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Lampasas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5125541763
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Real Estate Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $190,627
- Expenses
- $187,075
- Assets
- $208,848
- Liabilities
- $117,559
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRENDA STUDT (PAST PRESIDENT)
- CLAYTON STROLLE (PRESIDENT)
- JD LEWIS (PRESIDENT ELECT)
People named in this filing
- BRENDA STUDT (PAST PRESIDENT)
- BROOKE HARLANDER (Treasurer)
- GERALD MCCARTY (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The austin chapter of naiop provides a local forum for leading commercial real estate industry education, government affairs representation, networking, and business development
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide educational and networking opportunities for commercial real estate development professionalsIncreased membership to 208 members or 20% over previous yearHeld 15 events with 980 attendeesIncreased our contact mailing list to 820 or 44% over last yearCreated a public policy committee to address local & state issues effecting commercial real estateEstablished a board of directors policy
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.9%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 66.1%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 47.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 43.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.9% of revenue deployed · 66.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $124K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.