Austen Everett Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453214190
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2066190187
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,808
Expenses
$20,916
Assets
$8,317
Liabilities
$2,113

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • June Leahy (CEO and Executive Director)
  • Tim Leahy (President)

People named in this filing

  • June Leahy (CEO and Executive Director)
  • Tim Leahy (President)
  • Danielle Pavlovic (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empowering kids in their fight against cancer through the strength and support of professional and collegiate athletes, teams, the athletic community and HERO grants. HOPE THROUGH SPORT.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Austen Everett Foundation empowers kids in their fight against cancer through the strength and support of professional and collegiate athletes, teams, and the athletic community. We provided 34 AEF/HERO grants for kids that share their inspiring stories, recognizing their courage and the impact of sports in their fight against cancer. We strive to inspire hope, strength, and resilience in kids fighting cancer, through the power of sports in their lives. HOPE THROUGH SPORT.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 78

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -72.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -71.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 78.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.