Aurora Women and Girls Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061587403
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- West Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8609693435
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $999,219
- Expenses
- $968,563
- Assets
- $1,570,714
- Liabilities
- $162,682
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER STEADMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER STEADMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $150,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The aurora women and girls foundation galvanizes resources to increase economic security, educational attainment, and leadership for women and girls in the greater hartford region.
What it reported doing in 2025
Aurora's research highlights the critical issues facing women and girls in the region. Beginning in 2019 and updated yearly, aurora partnered with other Connecticut women's funds and Connecticut data collaborative to create the women and girls data platform (wgdp), a cutting-edge tool to share information and equip nonprofits, government, and community members with information for the advancement of women and girls in Connecticut. An online, interactive tool, the wgdp provides access to publicly available data specific to regional, city, and statewide levels that is aggregated for gender and race. The data compares trends across regions and the state and AIDS in better understanding of local needs. Data is featured by demographics, health and safety, education, economic security, and civic engagement. The collaboration on the wgdp meant that we had the team in place to respond quickly to the data needs of the pandemic. In january 2021, aurora published essential equity: women, covid-19 and rebuilding Connecticut, a report that documented the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on women of color. Aurora distributed and presented the report's information to the governor's council on women and girls, the women's caucus of the Connecticut state legislature, the greater giving summit international conference held by the gates foundation, the permanent commission on the status of women in hartford, and numerous other local and statewide organizations to help center the needs of women of color in planning for pandemic relief and recovery. We offered two training sessions on data literacy, with 50 organizations serving women and girls participating in education on how to use the wgdp and essential equity report to document the need, improve programming and secure funding. In 2022, aurora produced exposing ct's eviction crisis, a research collaboration with ct data collaborative and ct's fair housing center that for the first time ever showed the gender and race of those facing eviction proceedings. An interactive map shows where evictions have been filed since 2017 and we are seeing a return to pre-pandemic levels, with women of color disproportionately affected. The Connecticut legislature had this important information while they debated and ultimately passed new legislation guaranteeing tenants access to free legal counsel during eviction proceedings. We hope that this will result in more women and their families staying safely housed. In 2023, aurora published elusive equity: continuing effects of the pandemic on women's economic security, a follow up to assess the continuing pandemic-related obstacles to women's economic security in the state. The report was featured on an episode of national public radio's disrupted podcast, which reaches a statewide and national audience. In 2024, aurora published beyond homework: supports needed for student mothers, a report that highlighted that 1 in 5 women students is a mother (national data) and that 70% of student mothers take out loans to pay for college. Gaps in completion rates leave black and latina single mother students vulnerable to amassing educational debt without the benefit of completing the degree. In 2025, to mark aurora's 25th anniversary, we published toward equity: investing in women and girls for Connecticut's future. A bold call to action and reflectionchronicling the status of Connecticut's women and girls over the past 25 years, it urges deeper investment in equity-driven solutions and challenges philanthropy and policymakers to center racial and gender equity, creating a stronger, more inclusive Connecticut where everyone can thrive.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.3%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 68.7%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.8%; rating input score 97; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.3% of revenue deployed · 68.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $665K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.