Aurora Athletic Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
381452945
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Ironwood, MI, USA
Phone
9069320321
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,614
Expenses
$79,086
Assets
$52,277
Liabilities
$31,674

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARC BEHRENDT (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS TEIGE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL RIMKUS (TREASURER)
  • MARC BEHRENDT (PRESIDENT)
  • LAURIE SCHENK (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop and promote athletics. To provide a social outlet among members. To support various youth programs within the ironwood area.

What it reported doing in 2024

Sponsor gogebic range horseshoe league sponsor range oldtimers softball team sponsor gogebic county womens pool league sponsor gogebic county underhand dart league donation to ironwood schools for youth athletic programs sponsor suicide prevention softball tournament sponsor ironwood little league donation to ironwood polar bear youth hockey donation to superior bass club kids fishing sponsor american legion baseball donation to pat odonnel civic center donaton to superior volley ball league

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.1%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.1% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.