Aurora Airport Improvement Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831468040
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Aurora, OR, USA
Phone
5035196059
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$72,500
Expenses
$149,759
Assets
$7,463

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BRUCE BENNETT (TREASURER)
  • ANTHONY HELBLING (CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Further the economic improvement of business and aviation activities associated with Aurora State Airport in the interest of business and property owning members of the association;1. Approximately 50% of our time and resources - Work with State, County and surrounding community officials to promote the safe and efficient operation of business and aviation operations at Aurora State Airport. This work is ongoing and conducted as duties of the board members and association members, all of which are volunteers.2. Approximately 50% of our time and resources - Work directly with Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) (Airport Owner) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to develop and promote safe and efficient aviation operational improvements to the airport. Specifically, developing strategies associated with maintenance of existing runway and taxiways as well as the improvement of same to include extensionof the runway. This work is ongoing and conducted as duties of the board memb

What it reported doing in 2025

Further the economic improvement of business and aviation activities associated with Aurora State Airport in the interest of business and property owning members of the association;

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -106.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -20.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.