Aultman Health System

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320483994
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Canton, OH, United States
Phone
330-452-9911
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,049,448,649
Expenses
$1,028,150,167
Assets
$545,636,968
Liabilities
$125,360,982

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

76 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICK L HAINES (CEO - AHF UNTIL 6/30/24; DIRECTOR - AH, AACH, ACON)
  • ROBERT MULLEN (CEO - AHF START 7/1/24; DIRECTOR - AH, AACH, ACON,)
  • ANNE GUNTHER (PRESIDENT - AH; DIRECTOR - AH,AACH, AOH, ACON, ANC)
  • RYAN JONES (PRESIDENT - AACH & AOH)
  • JEAN PADDOCK PHD (PRESIDENT - ACON)

Highest reported compensation

  • SUNITHA VEMULAPALLI MD (PHYSICIAN - ANCMG): $1,660,688 total reported compensation
  • RAZA KHAN MD (PHYSICIAN - ANCMG): $1,317,757 total reported compensation
  • ADARSH VENNEPUREDDY MD (PHYSICIAN - ANCMG): $996,888 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Leading our community to improved health. In March, Aultman Woodlawn received approval to increase the number of patient beds for inpatient rehabilitation. This expansion allowed us to provide short-term rehabilitation to additional patients. And with the Compassionate Care Center and home healthcare (Aultman Health Care in Your Home) also available on campus, Aultman Woodlawn is able to provide much needed care and support to even more of our families, friends and neighbors. Aultman began offering Inspire sleep technology to treat obstructive sleep apnea in June of 2023. A great solution to help patients get the consistent quality sleep they need, Inspire is an implantable device. It is recommended for those patients diagnosed with.

What it reported doing in 2024

Aultman orrville hospital is a not-for-profit, 25 bed critical access hospital that has served orrville and the eastern wayne county community for more than 70 years. Aultman orrville hospital is a critical access hospital accredited by the joint commission.as a not-for-profit hospital, aultman orrville hospital provides high-quality health care programs and services that are accessible to all patients, regardless of their ability to pay. Aultman orrville hospital funds are generally reinvested in facility and equipment improvements, enhancements in patient care, medical training, education, physician recruitment and community outreach.each year, aultman orrville hospital provides a significant amount of care for patients having no government or private health care insurance or low-income patients. Aultman orrville hospital also serves patients covered by public programs such as medicaid, and payments from these federally funded programs do not always cover the total cost of service.since becoming a subsidiary of aultman health foundation, aultman orrville hospital has made improvements in its delivery of care, and the community has greater access to advanced health care services. Aultman orrville hospital combines close to home convenience with cutting edge technology to offer an array of inpatient and outpatient services.aultman orrville hospital provides care ranging from the family birth center to skilled nursing care on the inpatient transitional care unit. Additional services include diagnostic imaging services, laboratory and outpatient testing, rehabilitation services, surgical and endoscopic procedures, medical and surgical care, and highly effective and efficient emergency department. The mission of aultman orrville hospital is "to lead our community to improved health."

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 86.2%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.3%; rating input score 99; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 64.2%; rating input score 64; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 86.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 43 of 67 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $886.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.7M · 76 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $33M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 39 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 30 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 34 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.