Augusta Volunteer Fire Company Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 556023500
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Augusta, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3046167084
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $540,047
- Expenses
- $386,467
- Assets
- $1,963,902
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BENJAMIN HOTT (PRESIDENT)
- GLENN OATES (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BENJAMIN HOTT (PRESIDENT)
- GLENN OATES (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- JANAE HOTT (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide fire and rescue to the surrounding community on a volunteer basis.
What it reported doing in 2025
Maintenance of fire trucks and fire station. Training for volunteer fire fighters and all required equipment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 66% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.7%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.08; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 62 of 62 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $386K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.