Augusta Futbol Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272800057
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Phone
5404333777
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,426
Expenses
$20,781
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRITT BECKER (PRESIDENT)
  • DOUG HOLROYD (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRITT BECKER (PRESIDENT)
  • DOUG HOLROYD (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTINA DELANGE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Augusta fc is organized as an educational organization that fosters the physical, psychological, and emotional growth and development of its participants through the sport of soccer. Augusta fc promotes the sport of soccer by establishing a strong recreational foundation with additional opportunities for quality academy and travel experiences. Augusta fc provides a variety of opportunities for its participants to acquire and develop skills commensurate with their abilities. Augusta fc is also committed to developing the knowledge and expertise of our coaches to provide the best possible experience for the participants.

What it reported doing in 2014

Promotion of soccer through in augusta county, city of waynesboro, and sity of staunton

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,357.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.