Augusta Flying Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900993814
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Martinez, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7062514889
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $199,695
- Expenses
- $170,049
- Assets
- $255,195
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael Ashton Parker (President)
- Matthew Henson (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Michael Ashton Parker (President)
- Matthew Henson (Vice President)
- Jim M Garrison Jr (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Social Club (Share Ownership of Airplanes) The club exists to share ownership of aircraft. The aircraft are paid for on an hourly basis using the Tachometer time in the aircraft. The club owns two Cessna 172 aircraft registration N2776E and N62GK. N62GK flew 534 hours and N2776E flew 462 hours in 2025.
What it reported doing in 2025
Augusta Flying Club provided approximately 40 members with shared access to two club-owned Cessna 172 aircraft, N2776E and N62GK, for recreational and social flying activities. Members paid aircraft-use charges based on aircraft tachometer time. During 2025, N62GK flew 462 hours and N2776E flew 534 hours, totaling 996 flight hours.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. No material rating questions were generated from the available inputs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.7%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 73.6%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.8%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 100% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 44.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.7% of revenue deployed · 73.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $125K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.