Audiences Unlimited Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
310946267
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Phone
2604241064
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$390,299
Expenses
$2,222,360
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBORAH BECKMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARY TIMM-ZIMMERMAN (DIRECTOR)
  • RHIANNON BUELL (TREASURER)
  • NANCY LOURAINE (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Audiences unlimited creates cultural experiences that enrich the lives of people with limited access to the arts.

What it reported doing in 2024

Audiences unlimited provided live, socially-distanced indoor and outdoor arts programs for audience members and participants, including music, dance, and theatre reaching individuals. These individuals had the opportunity to participate in multiple arts experiences depending upon the facility and the ability to congregate safely. In addition, virtual video programming featuring our local artists was provided reaching an undetermined number of audience members. This includes audiences in partnering long-term health facilities, residential care facilities, and in an academy for adults with cognitive and developmental disabilities. Most programs took place on-site. Some were presented virtually in facilities that do not permit live music. All participants otherwise would not have the opportunity to experience professional music and cultural arts programs. Audiences unlimited's (aui) mission is to create cultural experiences that enrich the lives of people with limited access to the arts. Aui's programming enriches the quality of life of residents in health/residential care facilities and for adults with cognitive and developmental disabilities by providing cultural resources and programs that refresh and inspire the mind, body and spirit. When a person lives at a facility, they face challenges and loss of independence that prevent them from being integrated in the fabric of the community. The need is great for these members of our community to have experiences that reduce the feelings of isolation and improve their quality of life by bringing them joy and happiness. The second group is comprised of adults of all ages with developmental disabilities who attend l.i.f.e. Adult day academy. These individuals may struggle to make meaningful social connections or face limited opportunities to arts experiences due to behaviors or caretaking situations. Approximately 40% of these individuals live in group homes and have very limited access to music. Facility programming: aui serves as a catalyst uniting local artists and entertainers with the needs of long-term care facilities by offering a variety of choices, such as solo and duos and small philharmonic ensembles as well as other styles of entertainment. In the 2021-2022 fiscal year, aui had long-term care partner facilities receiving live programming for over individuals receiving multiple experiences and an additional partner facilities receiving 8 hours of digital video programming to an undetermined number of audience members. The in-facility program offered residents the opportunity to experience arts performances where they live that fulfill quality of life attributes including the value of active aging, emotional stimulation, intellectual fulfillment, the sense of community, and sensory engagement. Digital videos of aui musicians and dancers ensured that programming was still accessible to those we serve at care facilities closed to performers. All care-facilities each use the videos in different ways, but some of the uses have included backing for general exercise programming, being played at friday happy hours, on individual room tvs, and over the facility-wide sound system. Second, the in-community program offered free tickets to events in partnership with our arts and cultural partners. People attended a variety of performances and cultural designations. Finally, the my expression (me) program at l.i.f.e. Adult day academy provided adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities regular arts participation experiences offering opportunities for structured, shared, and personal social experiences and an outlet for appropriate self- expression. The me program was presented safely onsite at l.a.d.a. From august through june. Twenty-five minute socially-distanced programs included live music experiences, theatre experiences, and adaptive dance experiences. The dance and theatre "final performances" were recorded for the students' families and caregivers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 92% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.4%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.3 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -469.4%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 53.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.