Attack Poverty
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452401548
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Richmond, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7138280916
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-929,204
- Expenses
- $2,729,557
- Assets
- $1,640,753
- Liabilities
- $209,931
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marguerite Williams (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Marguerite Williams (CEO): $30,550 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To strengthen under-resourced communities through spiritual growth, education, revitalization, and basic needs.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Flourishment Program supports adults in overcoming barriers and building long-term stability through individualized goal planning, coaching, and connection to community resources. During the year,36 adults enrolled, with 30 actively engaged at year-end. Participants made measurable progress toward employment, financial stability, and personal well-being, including securing jobs, accessing mental health support, and strengthening social support networks. Participant retention and re-engagement reflect strong trust and program relevance. The program also expanded its support network through the launch of CarePortal, a platform connecting local churches to tangible community needs. This partnership increased resource capacity and strengthened collaborative support for participating families. Volunteer Program Attack Poverty continued strengthening its volunteer-led service model through implementation of a comprehensive Volunteer Strategy focused on targeted recruitment, structured onboarding, role alignment, and ongoing training. During the year: . 97% of recruited regular volunteers completed onboarding . 67% annual retention rate achieved among active volunteers This approach increased program capacity while maintaining program quality and stewardship of financial resources. The expense break-out is as follows: UGANDA - 13,500 INDIA - 24,905 Flourishment - 6,825 -------------- 45,230 LINE 4D - OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES --------------------------------- Education programs equip adults and youth with skills that support academic success, employment readiness, health, and personal development. Adult Education: 176 adults participated in classes including English as a Second Language, computer literacy, financial literacy, and job readiness. Through partnership with STCH Ministries, Faith & Work and Faith & Finances courses integrated workforce preparation and financial capability. The first Spanish-language Faith & Work cohort launched at the Northside location, expanding access for Spanish-speaking participants. Health education expanded through Wellness Wednesdays in partnership with AgriLife Better Living for Texans, combining nutrition education, cooking demonstrations, and physical activity engagement Youth Education: 271 children participated in after-school, summer, and enrichment programs including You Can Academy and seasonal camps. Programming strengthened academic and social-emotional development through STEM, arts, athletics, and wellness activities. Outcomes included: . 96% of students rated Thriving or Flourishing on program wellbeing measures . 87% achieved a GPA of 75 or higher . Reported improvements in communication, leadership, confidence, reading engagement, and academic performance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 63%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -393.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $31K · 10 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $145K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.