Attack Poverty

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452401548
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Richmond, TX, USA
Phone
7138280916
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-929,204
Expenses
$2,729,557
Assets
$1,640,753
Liabilities
$209,931

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marguerite Williams (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Marguerite Williams (CEO): $30,550 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To strengthen under-resourced communities through spiritual growth, education, revitalization, and basic needs.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Flourishment Program supports adults in overcoming barriers and building long-term stability through individualized goal planning, coaching, and connection to community resources. During the year,36 adults enrolled, with 30 actively engaged at year-end. Participants made measurable progress toward employment, financial stability, and personal well-being, including securing jobs, accessing mental health support, and strengthening social support networks. Participant retention and re-engagement reflect strong trust and program relevance. The program also expanded its support network through the launch of CarePortal, a platform connecting local churches to tangible community needs. This partnership increased resource capacity and strengthened collaborative support for participating families. Volunteer Program Attack Poverty continued strengthening its volunteer-led service model through implementation of a comprehensive Volunteer Strategy focused on targeted recruitment, structured onboarding, role alignment, and ongoing training. During the year: . 97% of recruited regular volunteers completed onboarding . 67% annual retention rate achieved among active volunteers This approach increased program capacity while maintaining program quality and stewardship of financial resources. The expense break-out is as follows: UGANDA - 13,500 INDIA - 24,905 Flourishment - 6,825 -------------- 45,230 LINE 4D - OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES --------------------------------- Education programs equip adults and youth with skills that support academic success, employment readiness, health, and personal development. Adult Education: 176 adults participated in classes including English as a Second Language, computer literacy, financial literacy, and job readiness. Through partnership with STCH Ministries, Faith & Work and Faith & Finances courses integrated workforce preparation and financial capability. The first Spanish-language Faith & Work cohort launched at the Northside location, expanding access for Spanish-speaking participants. Health education expanded through Wellness Wednesdays in partnership with AgriLife Better Living for Texans, combining nutrition education, cooking demonstrations, and physical activity engagement Youth Education: 271 children participated in after-school, summer, and enrichment programs including You Can Academy and seasonal camps. Programming strengthened academic and social-emotional development through STEM, arts, athletics, and wellness activities. Outcomes included: . 96% of students rated Thriving or Flourishing on program wellbeing measures . 87% achieved a GPA of 75 or higher . Reported improvements in communication, leadership, confidence, reading engagement, and academic performance.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 63%; rating input score 63
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -393.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $31K · 10 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $145K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.