Atrium Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311079309
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2021
- Location
- Dayton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9374999942
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $280,348,580
- Expenses
- $246,869,054
- Assets
- $275,128,015
- Liabilities
- $306,603,859
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL C RIORDAN (TRUSTEE / PREMIER CEO)
- KEVIN W HARLAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL C RIORDAN (TRUSTEE / PREMIER CEO): $1,579,749 total reported compensation
- KEITH D BRICKING MD (EVP & CHIEF CLINICAL OFFICER): $1,235,967 total reported compensation
- KEVIN W HARLAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $855,717 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We care. We teach. We innovate. We serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
The primary exempt purpose of atrium medical center is to provide comprehensive inpatient, outpatient, and emergency health care services to the residents of butler and warren counties. The hospital furthers its tax-exempt purpose by promoting the health of the community in many ways. See schedule h for more information.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 54
- Accountability: 53
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.8%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 79.4%; rating input score 79; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 20%; rating input score 20; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.11; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.8% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $239.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.6M · 30 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 12 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 34 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 20/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.