Atlas Youth Outreach
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843069991
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Arnold, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3145507846
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health, Crisis Intervention N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $143,140
- Expenses
- $127,719
- Assets
- $40,451
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shana Adams (President)
People named in this filing
- Shana Adams (President)
- Lindsay Krammer (Secretary)
- Kara Wall (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Atlas Youth Outreach exists to create a safe place for adolescents, ages 11-18, to participate in therapeutic, psychoeducational support groups and social engagement programs that support social and emotional growth and provide new opportunities for the youth to gain knowledge for successful futures
What it reported doing in 2025
The Navigate program provides free psychoeducational mental health support groups to teens in Jefferson County Missouri both in local schools and at our home office that encourage social and emotional growth. Navigate provides teens education and resources so they may create their own path to a successful future. Atlas had a successful year with being able to conduct 71 different groups for free and serve 308 teens through the Navigate Program. Many of those teens returned for more than one group. Of the 71 mental health support groups two groups were ongoing monthly groups, Adolescent Stress for teens to find monthly support from peers for stressors in their lives, and LGBTQIA+ Community Building for teens who identify in this community to find mental health support for their unique struggles. The remaining groups were 6 or 8 weeks in length and included 4 mental health summer programs with an emphasis on creating a happy mindset, 7 anxiety management groups, 2 healthy relationships groups, 6 peer relationships, 5 depression and self esteem, 4 conflict resolution, 4 Healthy Minds, 1 understanding anger, 4 healing and loss for grief, 2 chill skills (coping strategies), 1 group on neurodivergency, 2 groups on the effects of social media, 7 stress less groups, 3 confidence building, 3 social skills, 2 Mental Health 101, 1 group to support youth in foster care, and 1 social anxiety group. Atlas also provided two ongoing groups with the DeSoto school district at the Innovative Learning Center and the DeSoto Annex, both are alternative school programs within the district. Of our 308 teens 58% identified as female, 39% identified as male and 3% identified as nonbinary. 83% identify as white, 9% identify as multiracial, 3% identify as Hispanic, 1% identified as asian, 1% identified as as American Indian/Pacific Islander, 1% identified as other, and 1% preferred not to say. 39% of our teens live in homes that make under $50,000 a year and 14% live in homes with someone other than their biological parents. These environmental factors can lead to an increase in mental health concerns and can also be a barrier to accessing mental health services. Atlas provided 33 groups in the Atlas office and 33 groups in local school districts including the Fox C6 District, Northwest R1, DeSoto 73, Dunklin R-5, Hillsboro R-3, and New Day Treatment Program. We partnered with Jefferson County Community Partners to provide 5 groups to youth in foster care. We have had pleasing results from our surveys and we saw positive results for all of our groups.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 73.7%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 39.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 47.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66% of revenue deployed · 73.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $94K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.