Atlantic Human Resources Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
221761486
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2009
Forms available
Form 990 2009
Location
Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Phone
6093484131
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Emergency Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,211,449
Expenses
$13,121,661
Assets
$2,977,815
Liabilities
$986,887

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To eliminate poverty and its causes

What it reported doing in 2009

Housing Assistance Program- To alleviate homeownership and housing needs. Monthly meetings were held with each customer to increase their ability to manage their own affairs. As a result of the program 87% of the families maintained housing for at least six months once the subsidy ended. 50% of the families who receive a rent subsidy and were able to maintain their current residence. Atlantic Human Resources provided Home Energy Assistance to the community to alleviate heating and cooling needs of low-income residents and to eliminate the low income client from loosing their present home. These payments enable a client to sustain themselves until the LIHEAP applications are processed and paid. As a result of this program, 16,000 clients are able to avoid having their utilities shutoff during the period of November 1 through March 31 of each year. Reporting is done quarterly. 5.6 Pantry Program / 6.2 Food Program - Atlantic Human Resources has constructed this program to alleviate the aforementioned needs. This program ensures that nutrition is provided to low income families. The initial tally is taken from those clients who qualify through our intake process. The remaining number of families or clients are counted and recorded on a monthly basis. The pantries are funded on our fiscal year and reporting is done quarterly. The program is being implemented at several strategically convenient sites. As a result of this program 1,550 clients will benefit during the course of a year. 7.1 Referral Program-- Atlantic Human Resources has constructed this program to alleviate the aforementioned needs. This program is designed to ensure that a low income family or individual in need will receive the proper assistance. The program is run on a fiscal cycle of October 1 to September 30 and reporting is done quarterly. The program is implemented through our standard intake procedure. This entails forwarding the calls to the section of the office that handles the implementation of the program. As a result of this program 5,562 low income families or individuals are provided the needed assistance. 7.2 Childcare- - Atlantic Human Resources has constructed this program to alleviate the aforementioned needs. Namely, the need for a low income client to maintain employment and not loose a substantial part of their income by virtue of childcare needs. This program will meet the needs of the low income clients through this program. A Subsidy for childcare will be provided for qualified low income families. The child will then be provided with quality care, education, nutrition and safe environment. The centers provide this service year round with the fiscal cycle of October 1 through September 30 and reporting is done quarterly. As a result of this program 82 children will benefit from the program. 7.3 Minister's Home Detention Program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $12.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $134K · 21 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.