Atlanta HBCU Alumni Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593817259
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Smyrna, Georgia, United States
- Phone
- (404) 260-7404
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $312,260
- Expenses
- $331,168
- Assets
- $62,798
- Liabilities
- $29,352
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel Ford (President)
- Judy Days-Dee (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Daniel Ford (President)
- Judy Days-Dee (Vice President)
- Rachelle Wicker (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Atlanta Metro HBCU Alumni Alliance, Inc. is a non-profit community-based organization that collaborates to strengthen our community through impactful programs and support underserved students interested in attending HBCUs. Leading the way to improve the quality of education in the urban community, the HBCU Alumni community has partnered with a District of Columbia public school to fill school year resource gaps in supplies and education. Tapping the wide range of knowledge and resource base of our membership, we seek to connect students to skills building opportunities in college preparatory subject matter such as SAT preparation, computer engineering and coding, STEM and specific subject tutoring. To meet day-to-day demands, school supply and backpack collection will help fill a necessary need for underserved students. [](.
What it reported doing in 2024
5K/10K Run/Walk - 64 HBCU Alumni Chapters share in the profits from the event depending on the number of race registrations, sponsors, vendors and miscellaneous revenue generated. Registration Fees range from $25 to $65 depending on when participants register. Each Chapter is responsible for actively participating in planning meetings, soliciting a minimum number of registrations and providing a minimum number of volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 66% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 67.8%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.1%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 72% of revenue deployed · 67.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $225K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.