Atlanta Golden Retriever Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454228943
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hoschton, GA, USA
Phone
6785751237
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Training, Behavior

Reported finances

Revenue
$97,138
Expenses
$102,301
Assets
$45,806
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TERRI EVERLINE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JAN MOORE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NANCY HAMMOND (DIRECTOR)
  • PAUL EVERLINE (DIRECTOR)
  • TERESA HOSKINS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The atlanta golden retriever club, inc. Is established to encourage and promote the reponsible ownership of golden retrievers; to encourage and promote the quality breeding of pure-bred golden retrievers and to do all possible to bring their natural qualities to perfection; to protect and advance the interests of the breed by encouraging sportsmanslike competition at doe shows, obedience trials, and field trials; to conduct sanctioned and licensed specialty shows, obedience trials, field trials, and agility trials under the rules and regulations of the american kennel club.

What it reported doing in 2024

Conformation specialty and certificate of conformation assessment tests (cca) - the organization hosts conformation specialty shows for akc registered golden retrievers in which certified akc judges determine how a particular dog performs certain duties as compared to conforming to the standars for the breed. The akc certified judges award a certicate of conformation assessment (cca) as the result of the individual dog's perfomance against these standards. Akc certified judges are compensated at market rates for their services in awarding these certificates. Organization members and members of the community are utilized as volunteers for these events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $143K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.