Zoo Atlanta

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581655184
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Atlanta, GA, US
Phone
404-624-9453
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Zoo, Zoological Society

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,311,626
Expenses
$35,610,875
Assets
$126,117,099
Liabilities
$7,354,554

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

38 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RAYMOND KING (CEO & PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RAYMOND KING (CEO & PRESIDENT): $883,014 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER SMITH (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $235,774 total reported compensation
  • ERIC HALL (VP FACILITIES): $233,665 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Zoo Atlanta's mission is to inspire discovery, conservation, and stewardship of the natural world through engaging experiences with animals.

What it reported doing in 2025

The visitor experience: in 2025, zoo atlanta welcomed 816,026 visitors, offering unforgettable opportunities to connect with wildlife from around the world. From familiar native species to critically endangered animals on the brink of extinction, the zoo created meaningful, up-close experiences that inspired guests to care for the natural world. Internationally recognized for its leadership in science, conservation, education, and behavioral research, zoo atlanta brought its mission to life through. Daily keeper talks, interactive wildlife presentations, education programs, and year-round special events. In 2025, the zoo also invested in enhancing both the guest experience and animal wellbeing through significant capital improvements, including a $3 million transformation to the african lion complex and a reimagined experience aboard the norfolk southern zoo train. Community access programs: zoo atlanta broadened its reach through new programs and events in 2025. We launched a new access program, offering significantly reduced general admission and memberships for supplemental nutrition assistance program ("snap") cardholders and their families, helping to ensure that financial barriers do not prevent guests from enjoying the zoo. From its launch in may through the end of 2025, the program served nearly 33,000 guests with nearly 2,000 memberships purchased. In addition to this new program, we were also proud to continue many ongoing access programs in 2025, such as the safari camp scholarship program, which made the zoo atlanta camp experience accessible to 96 students; the sponsored admissions and wild walks programs, which provided free admission to over 13,000 students from title i schools; and our special programming for educators at the zoo, which reached nearly 600 educators. We also expanded our commitment to workforce development through a new partnership with fort valley state university, creating clear pathways for students, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds, to pursue careers in veterinary medicine and animal care through hands-on learning, mentorship, and professional exposure. Lastly, zoo atlanta continued to provide free admission through programs like zoo access and city of atlanta and fulton county family days. Combined, free admission through the zoo's access programs accounted for 6% of our total attendance in 2025. Conservation initiatives: zoo atlanta is directly involved in field conservation programs for wildlife and wild places around the globe, including work in africa, asia, central and south america, in addition to the state of Georgia. The zoo's contributions range from funding for other established conservation organizations who share its mission, enabling a greater total impact in the field than might be achievable by a single organization, to projects in which its own staff are personally engaged in field work, community outreach programs, research, and education programs on continents around the globe. The zoo strengthened its global conservation impact through enduring partnerships and new investments in field-based work in 2025. We proudly celebrated 30 years of collaboration with the dian fossey gorilla fund, formalizing the organization as zoo atlanta's third signature conservation partner. This milestone underscores a shared commitment to protecting gorillas and their habitats through long-term research, anti-poaching efforts, and community engagement in central africa. Zoo atlanta also joined the wildlife confiscations network, expanding our role in international efforts to combat illegal wildlife trade by supporting the rescue, rehabilitation, and placement of confiscated animals. We also continued to honor the legacy of the late dr. Jennifer mickelberg, zoo atlanta's former vice president of collections and conservation, through awarding the second annual recipients of the mickelberg field conservation grant to zoo atlanta team members pursuing hands-on conservation pro

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Pass
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 94.3%; rating input score 94; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.54; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 30 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $32M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $883K · 38 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.3M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 40 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.