Athens Samaritans Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752267838
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Athens, TX, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,230
Expenses
$160,844
Assets
$64,004
Liabilities
$597

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ray Hicks (President)
  • John Hines (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ray Hicks (President)
  • John Hines (Vice President)
  • Linda Henry (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Athens Samaritans Inc furnishes materials and labor to build wheelchair ramps and landings so people can enter and exit their homes safely We make various repairs to homes to make them safe for the elderly indigent and or disabled who are physically and or financially unable to make the needed repairs themselves All installs and or repairs are done free of charge to the home owner

What it reported doing in 2025

Repair and or replace Electrical for 6 people 6965 Repaired Roofs for 15 people 15407 Tree Service for 7 people 9100 Furnished Medical Equipment for 2 people 307 Furnished Appliances for 2 people 730 Miscellaneous Labor for 2 people 575 Bulk Workday Supplies 598 Miscellaneous Expense for Projects 3259 Trailer and Storage Expense 360 Payroll Tax 1193 Meeting Expense 215 Auto Expense 1300 Office Expense 521 Trac-Phone Service 160 Insurance1415 Tools and Equipment Repairs 1639

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -39.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $145K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.