Athena Credit Union Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 310527856
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Springfield, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9373282126
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Credit Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $517,527
- Expenses
- $739,472
- Assets
- $13,086,727
- Liabilities
- $11,142,573
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Athena Credit Union, Inc. is a full service financial institution whose mission is to provide safe, high quality personal financial service to our valued members while maintaining financial stability.
What it reported doing in 2012
The organization is a state chartered member owned cooperative credit union that provides financial services and products to the member owners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 69% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -42.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.7; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $507K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $114K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.