Ataaxum Pomkwaan Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
884312800
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Pauma Valley, CA, USA
Phone
6192754313
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,835
Expenses
$95,244
Assets
$36,768

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ami Admire (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Ami Admire (CEO)
  • Esmeralda Salcedo (CFO, Secretary)
  • Robert Wallace (Solidarity Owl)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of this organization is to provide community resources centered around healing and improved mental health for the continued survival of Native and Indigenous peoples.

What it reported doing in 2024

The California Endowment (TCE)Under this title, funds are used to increase organizational capacity to operate independently of a fiscal sponsor, strengthen workplace and wellness supports to ataaxum team members, continued student and family advocacy addressing the unique academic and cultural needs of the community e.g. cultural programming and co-learning experiences that uplift the transfer of Indigenous knowledge from one generation to the next, and funding support for GONA.ii. Approximately 500 Native youth, families, and non-Indigenous community members have benefited from direct services such as classes, camps, workshops, and trainings. Another 500 have benefitted indirectly through social media, tabling at events, and co-collaborating/co-organizing with local reservations to provide games, storytelling and ceremonies at annual community gatherings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.6%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.6%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.6% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $84K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.