At The Crossroads
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272603924
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, US
- Phone
- 415-487-0691
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $850,424
- Expenses
- $1,491,941
- Assets
- $1,355,634
- Liabilities
- $24,348
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ARTAVIA BERRY (Executive Dir.): $163,473 total reported compensation
- TARA KHAN (OPS. & FIN. DIR): $115,149 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Transforming Lives Through Unconditional Support
What it reported doing in 2024
Our direct service work is composed of street outreach, one-on-one counseling and food and supply support. Across all of our services, atc disseminated approximately $145,000 worth of supplies, including hot meals, fresh groceries, food boxes from our food pantry, hygiene and harm reduction supplies, and clothing in fy25. Outreach currently occurs two nights a week. Counselors walk the streets of the downtown/tenderloin area and offer much-needed supplies like snacks, hygiene items, and socks. When they see us night after night, individuals slowly begin to trust us and turn to us for support. Atc made 1,560 contacts with approximately 175 young people through street outreach over the last fiscal year. One-to-one counseling is the next level of our services at atc. Counselors meet with individuals during the daytime with the goal of developing healthy, long-term, unconditionally supportive relationships. Through the relationships we help clients identify and achieve their personal goals, developing the tools and plans to make them happen. This may include connecting clients with other agencies that can assist in meeting their needs for example housing attainment, employment readiness, and addressing more serious mental health and substance use issues. We support clients through the entire process to reduce barriers and help navigate challenges in a difficult bureaucracy. In fy25, atcs counselors had 1,011 counseling conversations with 175 counseling clients. We provided our counseling clients with at least 215 referrals to over 50 agencies. 90% of these clients achieved one or more of their individual life goals, including improving their housing, addressing their mental and physical health needs, finding employment, and returning to school and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 50.8%; rating input score 51
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -75.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 89.1% of revenue deployed · 50.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $758K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.