Assyrian National Council of Illinois
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363458487
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7732625589
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,778,365
- Expenses
- $33,645,549
- Assets
- $21,470,400
- Liabilities
- $2,428,601
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AUGER M ISMAIL (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN NIKHO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ABDULMASHIH BIRO (BOAR MEMBER): $18,000 total reported compensation
- YOUSSEF ODISHO (PROPERTY MANAGER): $6,600 total reported compensation
- YOUSIF ALKASS (PUBLIC RELATIONS): $4,700 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve the elderly, inspire the learning of young children, and strengthen our assyrian communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided educational and developmental support to youth in the chicago metropolitan area through tailored programs focused on assyrian language and cultural heritage. Engaged participants in community service and athletic programs to promote leadership, teamwork, and a strong sense of community identity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.3%; rating input score 99; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $30.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $18K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.