Avcp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920064285
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2015
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Bethel, AK, USA
Phone
9075433521
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,399,923
Expenses
$54,356,752
Assets
$66,137,927
Liabilities
$46,120,482

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MYRON NANENG (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MYRON NANENG (PRESIDENT): $173,952 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL HOFFMAN (EXECUTIVE VP): $165,020 total reported compensation
  • MARC STEMP (VP OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT): $154,231 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Yuput calillgutekluki elluarrluta yuuluallerkamtenun. Our Mission is to work together with Tribes to enhance sovereignty, self-sufficiency, and Our Way of Life.

What it reported doing in 2015

Self-governance: through these funds, avcp operates ten (10) different programs which provide many services to our member tribes and individual tribal members; including indian child welfare services, general assistance, burial assistance, child care services, higher education scholarships, probate and other land title services which ensure that all real estate transactions comply with nhpa, nepa and nagpra, and natural resource protection and development. Additionally, on behalf of our fully-compacted tribes, avcp provides pass-through funding, employee remuneration, and on-going training and support to develop the capacity of these tribes and promote their self-determination. Avcp negotiates, develops and monitors compliance with applicable tribal, federal, and state laws, regulations, contracts, cooperative agreements, memoranda of understanding, and/or memoranda of agreements that impact tribal sovereignty. Our tribes can compact for any or all of these programs each year.in 2015, the office of self governance funding furthered the following results:1. Our indian child welfare department represented 398 children in the avcp region, monitoring each child's progress in the child welfare system, and advocating in court on behalf of the child's tribe. Also in 2015, avcp increased prevention efforts to reduce the number of children entering the child welfare system in collaboration with the tanf department. This effort identifies families at risk and provides referrals and assistance in obtaining services.2. Our tribal service department provided an intensive grant writing seminar for tribal administrators from around the avcp region, as well as quickbooks training for bookkeepers.3. 42 tribes compacted for higher education services through our education, employment and training (ee&t) department. Altogether 159 students received higher education funding assistance.4. 40 tribes compacted for job placement and training services through the ee&t department and altogether 39 clients received job placement and funding assistance.5. 107 families in the avcp region and 238 children received childcare services through our ee&t department.6. Through our hip program, avcp constructed a public safety building for the village public safety officer program as well as 5 residential homes in the avcp region.7. The natural resources department continued to work with our tribes on the kuskokwim and yukon rivers to develop the capacity of the inter-tribal fish commissions. President obama recognized this effort when he visited Alaska in august of 2015, pledging to provide $350,000 in additional osg funding to support our continued work towards tribal co-management of the resources in our region.8. The natural resources department carried out two hazardous fuel reduction projects, clearing brush and trees around the perimeters of two village communities to prevent loss in the event of a wildfire.9. Our realty and cultural and environmental resources departments co-hosted land jurisdictional workshops for our tribes.10. The tribal justice department continued the work of assisting tribes in creating and updating tribal code.11. Our tribal services department provided 1,297 tribal id's in our bethel office and traveled throughout the region to provide an additional 1,135 tribal id's in the avcp village communities.12. Direct social service assistance to or for the benefit of individuals was provided through osg social service funding and through osg (or gaming-dedicated) funeral assistance (grants out totaling $691,799 and $239,880, respectively).

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $46.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $174K · 25 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.9M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 24 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.