Association of University Professors of Neurology
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 520889499
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Roseville, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9525456724
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $133,933
- Expenses
- $123,086
- Assets
- $455,896
- Liabilities
- $74,466
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN ENGLAND MD (PRESIDENT)
- CLAIRE HENCHCLIFFE MD (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- JOHN ENGLAND MD (PRESIDENT)
- CLAIRE HENCHCLIFFE MD (PRESIDENT EL)
- DAVID STANDAERT MD PHD (1ST VICE PRE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance and strengthen the academic neurology community through education, mentorship and the sharing of best practices among leaders in academic neurology.
What it reported doing in 2024
Besides the existing projects, there are many notable and exciting new activities that aupn has entered into this past year. Below is but a sampling of these activities: - successfully held the inaugural annual meeting. - revised and updated the aupn bylaws. - strengthened our partnership with the aan, securing dedicated aupn sessions at their 2025 annual meeting. - expanded our podcast offerings with a teaser segment titled leading edge focus points. - initiated the growth of the mentorship committee to include program directors and clerkship directors. - began developing an anti-harassment policy and a code of ethics to promote a respectful and inclusive community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.8%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 45.6%; rating input score 46
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.7; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.8% of revenue deployed · 45.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.