Association of Union Constructors
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 310784427
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Arlington, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7035243336
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,793,628
- Expenses
- $3,153,200
- Assets
- $6,379,436
- Liabilities
- $1,669,101
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JACOB SNYDER (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS BUCKMAN (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- JUSTIN BRUCE (PRESIDENT)
- DANIEL HOGAN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- MICHAEL DORSEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL DORSEY (VICE PRESIDENT): $266,156 total reported compensation
- DANIEL HOGAN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $156,477 total reported compensation
- KIRK WESTWOOD (DIRECTOR OF MARKETING): $146,462 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to act as an advocate for the union construction and maintenance industry advancing the cause through an educated and action-driven membership. We aim to enhance labor-management cooperation, workplace safety and health, and collaboration among construction users with the greater goal of making union contractors more competitive in the marketplace.
What it reported doing in 2024
Promotion of cooperation with labor organizations for prevention and settlement of disputes and fostering harmony in union construction and maintenance industries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 87.8%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $266K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 15 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.