Association of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine Program Directors

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431671834
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
8473016800
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,356,300
Expenses
$943,206
Assets
$4,380,553
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • James Frank MD (President)
  • Neal Chaisson MD (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • May Lee MD (Pres/Past Pres)
  • Mary Krider MD (Sec/Treasurer)
  • James Frank MD (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Apccmpd was created to facilitate excellence in clinical and research training of pulmonary, critical care and pulmonary and critical care medicine. To advance the next generation of medical educators. It provides a vehicle for communication among all training program directors, fellowship programs, and faculty and various organizations.

What it reported doing in 2024

The apccmpd offers nine annual abstract awards:1. Apccmpd research in medical education award- recognizes pulmonary and critical care medicine training program directors, associate program directors, key clinical faculty or fellows-in-training for their outstanding contributions and commitment to medical education research.2. The apccmpd award for novel fellowship education implementation recognizes pulmonary and critical care medicine training program directors for their outstanding contributions and commitment to medical education and training.3.the apccmpd award for excellence in fellowship prorgam administration recognizes program coordinators for outstanding contributions to fellowship program administration through the development of best practices or processes that have been successfully applied to the administrative operations of a pulmonary, critical care, or pccm fellowship program 4.the apccmpd scholarship in medical education research award provides $25k to fund 1 or 2 medical education research projects that further the field of pulmonary, critical care, or pulmonary critical care graduate medical education research.5. The chest and apccmpd medical educator diversity scholar fellowship award provides support and funding for fellow-in-training pursuing a career in medical education, and whose personal experiences and/or project goals will significantly contribute to the medical educator community. It focuses on creating mentorship opportunities for fellows at institutions with limited resources to train in teaching, formal medical education curricula, and medical education research. The scholarship covers expenses related to training a fellow for an academic career as a medical educator, funding for a 1-year medical education research project, and protected time for an external mentor.6.the ats-apccmpd joint medical education research grant for the physician scientist offers one $10,000, one-year grant to support faculty research on graduate medical education in adult pulmonary and critical care medicine. This grant encourages investigation into various gme topics aimed at developing future physician-scientists.7. The outstanding educator award honors an apccmpd member who has dedicated a significant portion of their career to advancing pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine education. This prestigious award recognizes individuals with sustained, innovative, and nationally recognized contributions to education, including teaching, mentoring, curriculum development, and program leadership.8. The mid-career educator award recognizes exceptional mid-career educators significantly impacting pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine education. These educators demonstrate excellence beyond their local institutions, contributing through teaching, mentoring, curriculum development, innovation, and program leadership. 9. The apccmpd emerging educator award recognizes one or two promising early-career medical educators demonstrating exceptional dedication to pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.64; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $265K reported
  • Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.