Association of Professional Ball Players of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 950510350
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4804049339
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Athletic Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $159,675
- Expenses
- $234,471
- Assets
- $102,814
- Liabilities
- $2,308
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jim Rantz (President)
- Del Crandall (1st Vice President)
- Mart Wolever (President)
- Robert Grich (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Matthew Hammons (Secretary-Treasurer): $40,000 total reported compensation
- Richard Beverage (Secretary-Treasurer): $7,668 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide and distribute funds to professional baseball players and other baseball personnel who are in need
What it reported doing in 2017
During the year 36 individuals were rendered assistance in the amount of $117,428. As a result of the assistance the individuals were able to pay for medical treatments, housing expenses and other necessities they could not afford.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 67% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 55
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -46.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -42.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -23.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -29.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $175K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $40K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.