Association of Pool & Spa Professionals Greater Houston Chapter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 746179540
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2816381135
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,418
- Expenses
- $59,726
- Assets
- $116,175
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER GEARY (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- ADAM GUNTER (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL MILLER CSP (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JIM BURNS (BOARD MEMBER AT LARGE)
- ALLEN KALKOMEY (BOARD MEMBER AT LARGE)
- JENNIFER GEARY (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The association of pool & spa professionals (apsp) is the world's oldest and largest association representing swimmng pool, spa, and hot tub manufacturers, manufacturers' agents, builders, designers, distributors, suppliers, installers, retailers, and service technicians. Dedicated to the growth and development of its members businesses and to promoting the enjoyment and safety of pools and spas, apsp offers a range of services, from professional development to advancing key legislation and regulation at all levels, to consumer outreach and public safety. Apsp is the only industry organization recognized by the american national standards institute to develop and promote naional standards for pools, hot tubs and spas.
What it reported doing in 2024
Membership activities for networking, training safety and awards of scholarships. Publication on monthly educational newsletter, technical training courses and consumer shows.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -103%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.95; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.