Association of Notre Dame Clubs Inc - Hanover Township

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232322264
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Exeter, PA, USA
Phone
5704984556
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,217
Expenses
$71,666
Assets
$38,743
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM LEVER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MIKE KLOPOTOSKI (BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
  • JULIE PANETTA (BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
  • BUD BUSTIN (BOARD OF DIRECTORS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To operate exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) by: a. Promoting the interests and welfare of the University of Notre Dame; b. Fostering and continuing the moral, spiritual and intellectual ideals taught and inspired by the University; c. Supporting the University administration in carrying out its educational policies & programs of service for the establishment and maintenance of the University as a leader among American and Catholic Universities; d. Assisting in securing financial support for the needs of the University; e. Lending support to projects and activities of students of the University, including assisting the educational opportunities of these students through sponsorship and support of University scholarship programs, and; f. Developing alumni fellowship and community through the establishment and maintenance of local and regional Notre Dame clubs.

What it reported doing in 2024

University of Notre Dame Scholarship Fund

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.9%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $67K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.