Association of Notre Dame Clubs Inc - Grand Rapids
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382486320
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Grand Rapids, MI, USA
- Phone
- 6162404461
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,468
- Expenses
- $72,838
- Assets
- $3,910
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- Madeline VerHey (BOD Class of '26)
- Paul Wilhelm (BOD Class of '28)
- Art Betancourt (BOD Class of '27)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To operate exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) by: a. Promoting the interests and welfare of the University of Notre Dame; b. Fostering and continuing the moral, spiritual and intellectual ideals taught and inspired by the University; c. Supporting the University administration in carrying out its educational policies & programs of service for the establishment and maintenance of the University as a leader among American and Catholic Universities; d. Assisting in securing financial support for the needs of the University; e. Lending support to projects and activities of students of the University, including assisting the educational opportunities of these students through sponsorship and support of University scholarship programs, and; f. Developing alumni fellowship and community through the establishment and maintenance of local and regional Notre Dame clubs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Football tickets and game bus trips
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -33.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.