Association of Mathematics Teachers of New York State
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 146029924
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Long Lake, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5857814559
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $136,334
- Expenses
- $167,648
- Assets
- $275,597
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- Amber Simpson (Journal Editor)
- Tricia Lynn Gonzales (Newsletter Editor)
- Dan Matoon (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of AMTNYS is to ensure better coordination of all activities of mathematics groups in the state, to afford a medium of exchanging views regarding the teaching of mathematics, to further the cooperative study of problems relating to the teaching of mathematics at all four levels (elementary, junior high, senior high, and college), to encourage active interest in mathematics and mathematics education, and to serve as liaison between the State Education Department and the field.
What it reported doing in 2024
Enhancement of mathematics instruction through seminars and education programs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 64.9%; rating input score 65
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -23%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 64.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $109K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.