Association of Inspectors General

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232906951
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2122378001
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,173,242
Expenses
$861,108
Assets
$868,134
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SELVYN W FLETCHER (PRESIDENT)
  • ISABEL MERCEDES CUMMING (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KIM CHATELAIN (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • FELIX JIMENEZ (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL J CASTRILLI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL J CASTRILLI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $115,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a civic, educational, charitable and benevolent organization for the exchange of knowledge among municipal, local, state, national and international inspectors general.

What it reported doing in 2024

Association of inspectors general (aig) is focused primarily on promoting excellence in the inspector general community by establishing and encouraging adherence to quality standards, sponsoring professional development and networking opportunities, certifying individuals in inspector general specific disciplines, supporting offices in governmental and external relations, and inspiring governmental entities to embrace the inspector general model as an effective tool in the fight to combat waste, fraud and abuse. In 1996, a group of state, local, and federal inspectors general, along with academics, recognized the need for a unified organization to represent the expanding inspector general community and to promote consistent standards and best practices. This led to the formation of the association of inspectors general (aig). The organization was officially established on january 26, 1997, during a formal signing ceremony at historic carpenters' hall in philadelphia, Pennsylvania. At this founding event, 49 individualsincluding inspectors general, professional staff, and educators from across the nationsigned the association's charter, laying the foundation for its mission and governance.the aig has more than 2,400 members across the united states, puerto rico, the u.s. Virgin islands, the northern mariana islands, and four countries internationally. The association is focused primarily on promoting excellence in the inspector general community by establishing and encouraging adherence to quality standards, sponsoring professional development and networking opportunities, certifying individuals in inspector general specific disciplines, supporting offices in governmental and external relations, and inspiring governmental entities to embrace the inspector general model as an effective tool in the fight to combat waste, fraud and abuse.the aig offers two semiannual aig institute certification training programs (institute), providing professionals with the opportunity to earn certification as a certified inspector general (cig), certified inspector general investigator (cigi), certified inspector general auditor (ciga), or certified inspector general evaluator (cige). In addition, the aig hosts a national annual training conference, which is held in conjunction with the aig's annual board of directors meeting. The aig is primarily funded by membership dues, conference training income, and institute certification fees.in addition to the national organization, the aig has six chapters that offer training and networking opportunities for their members. These chapters include: Illinois chapter, Florida chapter, New York/New Jersey chapter, western states chapter, district of columbia chapter, Texas chapter.the aig encourages offices of inspectors general to adopt and comply with one or more of the following standards: the association of inspectors general, principles and standards for offices of inspector general (green book); the institute of internal auditors, international standards for the professional practice of internal auditing (red book); and/or the united states government accountability office, government auditing standards (yellow book).the aig's peer review program is aimed at helping offices of inspectors general maintain compliance with applicable professional standards and legal requirements. These may include state statutes, local ordinances, municipal charters, or other forms of enabling legislation that govern the responsibilities and performance expectations of inspectors general. The peer review program provides independent and objective assurance that an office of inspector general is following its established policies and procedures and applicable standards.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.4%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.6%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.4% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 34 of 34 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $771K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 36 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.