Association of Hebrew Catholics

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141793829
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Roman Catholic
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$147,649
Expenses
$41,212
Assets
$145,731
Liabilities
$32,747

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID MOSS (PRESIDENT DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID MOSS (PRESIDENT DIRECTOR)
  • ANDREW SCHOLL (DIRECTOR)
  • MARIN BARRACK (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ahc seeks to help preserve the corporate identity and heritage of the people israel within the church. By gathering the jews who have entered the church we hope to help them rekindle and live out their collection vocation giving corporate witness to jesus - the messiah of israel and his church. We hope as well to help the church prepare for the day when they lord will gather and unite all persons to himself - hastening the day when all israel will proclaim blessed is he who comes in the name of the lord

What it reported doing in 2025

Corporate witness to jesus

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.2%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 72.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.54; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.2% of revenue deployed · 2.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.