Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731329613
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2152222800
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $87,651
- Expenses
- $113,790
- Assets
- $164,461
- Liabilities
- $45,867
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PRATIK BAHEKAR MD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AMIR AHUJA MD (IMMEDIATE PA)
- SARA NOBLE DO (SECRETARY)
- ROY HARKER (EXECUTIVE DI)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Aglp is a professional organization of psychiatrists, psychiatry residents, and medical students, and other mental health professionals which serves as a voice for the concerns of lesbians, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people within the psychiatric community. The association is committed to fostering an accurate understanding of sexual orientation and gender identity, opposing discriminatory practices against lgbt people, and promoting supportive, well informed mental health treatment for lgbt patients. The organization provides opportunities for affiliation and collaboration among people who share these concerns.
What it reported doing in 2024
Journal of gay and lesbian mental health
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 5
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.7%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 4
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 49.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.7% of revenue deployed · 3.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.