Association of County and City Information Systems

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900601223
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Newport, WA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,386
Expenses
$12,978
Assets
$180,035

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kipling Morris (President)
  • Tara Zarembra (Vice President)
  • JD Braathen (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Kipling Morris (President)
  • Tara Zarembra (Vice President)
  • Mary Thomas (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote communications between the information services functions of Cities Counties and other municipal agencies. To represent Cities Counties and other municipal agencies information systems interests to State officials and to call attention to legislation affecting data processing operations. To provide education for City county and other municipal agency officers on roles responsibilities and requirements of information systems departments.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education and promotion of information services functions including security for Counties Cities and related agencies. We maintain an email list serve for members to help one another and share information. We also held two conferences. One in the spring and one in the fall. We had a total number of 147 members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -54.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.87; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -26.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -51.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.