Association of Colleges of Sisters of St Joseph

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883199820
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
6266322096
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,666
Expenses
$69,772
Assets
$66,551
Liabilities
$8,085

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Martha Malinski (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Martha Malinski (Executive Director)
  • Don Boomgaarden (Chair)
  • Harry Dumay (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Association of Colleges of the Sisters of Saint Joseph ACSSJ draws together nine colleges and universities founded by the Sisters of Saint Joseph to articulate and further the contemporary expression of the of the charitable religious and educational mission and legacy of the Sisters of Saint Joseph ACSSJ fosters collaboration among all the member institutions provides mission resources for members and encourages mission integration on each campus The activities fall into three strategic priorities deepening relationships across member campuses creation of charism programs and resources and building partnerships to strengthen academic programs enrollment and operations

What it reported doing in 2024

Convene over a dozen communities of practice groups of colleagues by job title across nine institutions for regular meetings to share campus updates explore collaboration and provide professional support During the year ACSSJ hosted 51 meetings with a total attendance 201 people attending these meetings

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 59.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.