Association of Christian Ministries to Internationals
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742227972
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Placentia, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7142628757
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,997
- Expenses
- $139,653
- Assets
- $78,183
- Liabilities
- $1,083
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- CAM JANZEN (Director)
- francina de peter (Director)
- PAULA PARKER (Executive Dir.)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve as a network and catalyst for strategic collaboration among those who minister to and with intl students and scholars.
What it reported doing in 2025
ACMI program service accomplishments for FY 2025: Administration of the network This includes our online platforms, communication (with Board, committees, members, colleagues, and volunteers), budgets and fundraising, managing day-to-day operations, and mostly Zoom-based meetings, conferences, and events.Member support and services These include networking through a virtual platform and phone app, a member directory, community groups formed around topics of interest to our members, a weekly newsletter featuring resources and events, ACMI virtual socials, and daily (Mon-Fri) prayer meetings for and with members.iStudent-Link - ACMI-Link was renamed and relaunched as iStudent-Link in partnership with Lausanne WIN greatly expanding our global contacts for students who are on the move to new locations. This searchable directory is available for members.Thrive: Building Healthy ISM Communities - ACMIs annual conference provides vision, networking, and continuing education in ISM. This hybrid conference offered the opportunity to gather in live engagement hubs while interacting with virtual and in-person content. Replays of the workshop and plenary sessions are available to members who attended the conference in our virtual home for continued training.ACMI City Meet Ups - Fully in-person gatherings were held in Atlanta, New York City, and Dallas giving members and interested friends the opportunity to network and hear the latest ACMI news.Global Outreach - A volunteer Global Ambassador was appointed to strengthen global voices in ACMIs network. New members have joined from Africa, Asia, Europe, and Australia. ACMI staff also traveled to South Korea to participate in a 30th anniversary celebration for their international student ministry in Daejeon.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 64.4%; rating input score 64
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62% of revenue deployed · 64.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.