Association of Boards in Theological Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521932054
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Wilmington, DE, USA
Phone
3026547770
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Printing, Publishing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,226,315
Expenses
$3,625,067
Assets
$20,869,912
Liabilities
$304,627

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY KARDASH (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMY KARDASH (PRESIDENT): $290,664 total reported compensation
  • MATTHEW HUFMAN (VP FOR COMMUNICATION): $217,001 total reported compensation
  • GAIL CARLUCCI (VP FOR OPERATIONS): $122,288 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The in trust center for theological school's mission is to strengthen theological schools by connecting their leaders to essential resources for mission vitality.

What it reported doing in 2025

Resource consulting: the in trust center for theological schools is committed to walking alongside our member schools as they focus on achieving their mission. We provide individualized support through resource consulting. Resource consulting is based on a well-established learning model of institutional change: sustained and effective organizational learning comes when an institution augments its own assets and creativity with appropriate external resources. Combining internal assets with external resources like knowledge, tools, and talent empowers leaders to address challenges and take advantage of opportunities. Two initiatives that fall under this program are: 1. Resource grants - an in trust center resource grant is a dollar-for-dollar matching grant of up to $15,000 that is intended to address a particular innovative challenge or opportunity within an institution. The in trust center hopes that through a resource grant, a member school will engage an outside resource that allows them to support their work and further their school's mission. All member schools of the in trust center are eligible to apply for a resource grant; however, schools may not apply for a grant the subsequent year after receiving one. Schools must also show how they are providing matching funds.2. The wise stewards initiative focuses on building board capacity for better institutional governance. The curriculum, resources, and format of the three-year project have been designed especially for executive leadership and governing boards of theological schools by experienced educators, administrators, and consultants, all of whom have firsthand knowledge of graduate theological education. Participating schools receive practical insights, wise practices, tools, and strategies for inspiring and educating current and future board members. The program content is organized around four areas: o creating space for innovation, leading change, and maximizing potential.o reimagining governance as a force for change.o the president/board partnership in institutional renewal.o roles and responsibilities of boards of theological schools

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.8%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $34.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.76; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.8% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $291K · 18 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $232K reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 55 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.