Association in the Light of Christ Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272015408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
7862185748
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,620
Expenses
$11,553
Assets
$964

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Purpose for which this nonprofit corporation has been organized is to establish an evangelical missionary association, which will gather financial needs to fund social and physical, emotional, and spiritual projects. Establishing programs that will help improve the wellness of people in need around the world. Community development will provide jobs for the unemployed and decrease financial system issues.

What it reported doing in 2011

The organization developed Am I a Doctor Program, and the primary purpose of the program is to send pre-med undergraduate students to Medico Unidos in Managua, Nicaragua. They take an intense course of medical clinic practice. When they complete the course, they are placed with doctors to aid the poor people of Nicaragua. Our achievements for this program is not met at the end of the term; however, the goal is achieved when these undergraduate students become doctors and they return to aid the poor. Our mission for this particular program is to expose the future doctors of America to the poverty of the world, so they can begin to build experience in the medical field, motivation for their profession, and a heart to help the impoverished.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.9%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 61.5%; rating input score 61

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -65.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.9% of revenue deployed · 61.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.