ASSOCIATION FOR WOMEN IN SCIENCE INC Seattle Area Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521441206
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2069852903
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$183,032
Expenses
$64,474
Assets
$299,622
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tracy Popowics (Chapter President)
  • Laura Szkolar Sienkiewicz (Chapter Vice-president)

People named in this filing

  • Tracy Popowics (Chapter President)
  • Laura Szkolar Sienkiewicz (Chapter Vice-president)
  • Reitha Weeks (Chapter Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Supporting and providing resources for women in science, technology, engineering and math

What it reported doing in 2025

Outreach/Publicity - All local and national AWIS programs were publicized on our website and through social media outlets. Committee information and volunteer opportunities were publicized at events and on our website. Twp monthly email newsletters were prepared and sent to members and a publicity list. A raffle for free membership took place at monthly programs. A contractor facilitated website updates and social media announcements.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 64% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.3%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 97.5%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 64.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.65; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 41.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 38.3% of revenue deployed · 97.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.